ATP · Result
Elias Ymer v Marat Sharipov
Elias Ymer and Marat Sharipov met in the QF at Challenger Guangzhou: Marat Sharipov won 7-6 6-3. There is no earlier meeting between them in our match records.
This match
TournamentChallenger Guangzhou
RoundQF
SurfaceHard
ResultSharipov won 7-6 6-3
Model & market · Elias Ymer / Marat Sharipov
Elo40% / 60%
Glicko-242% / 58%
Market30% / 70%
Where they stand now · Elias Ymer / Marat Sharipov
Elo1503 / 1537
Glicko-21545 / 1592
Hard Elo1519 / 1691
Clay Elo1594 / 1547
Grass Elo1736 / 1537
The read
Rated today, on hard courts the model makes Sharipov a 73% favourite, from surface Elo of 1519 against 1691. Glicko-2, which weighs recent results more heavily, has Sharipov at 57%.
◆ Form
Elias Ymer · won 2 of last 5
L Marat Sharipov Guangzhou ChallengerHard 6-7 3-6
W Luca Castelnuovo Guangzhou ChallengerHard 7-6 6-4
W Semen Pankin Guangzhou ChallengerHard 5-7 7-5 6-3
L Pavel Kotov Shanghai ChallengerHard 6-3 3-6 6-7
L Yu Hsiou Hsu Zhangjiagang ChallengerHard 6-7 5-5
Marat Sharipov · won 4 of last 5
W Petr Bar Biryukov Guangzhou ChallengerHard 7-5 6-3
W Elias Ymer Guangzhou ChallengerHard 7-6 6-3
W Lloyd Harris Guangzhou ChallengerHard 4-6 7-6 6-3
W Thomas Fancutt Guangzhou ChallengerHard 6-2 6-3
L Ilya Ivashka Shanghai ChallengerHard 4-6 6-3 6-7
◆ Both players
Elias YmerElo 1503 · Glicko 1545 · career record, form and rating historyPlayer card →Marat SharipovElo 1537 · Glicko 1592 · career record, form and rating historyPlayer card →
◆ Other rivalries
Elias Ymer v Taro Daniel6 meetings · 4–2Head-to-head →Elias Ymer v Nikoloz Basilashvili4 meetings · 2–2Head-to-head →Elias Ymer v Chun Hsin Tseng3 meetings · 1–2Head-to-head →Elias Ymer v Pavel Kotov3 meetings · 1–2Head-to-head →Marat Sharipov v Lloyd HarrisChallenger GuangzhouHead-to-head →Marat Sharipov v Pavel KotovChallenger GuangzhouHead-to-head →Marat Sharipov v Taro DanielChallenger ShanghaiHead-to-head →
Head-to-heads exist for pairs who could meet soon — every scheduled match, and every pair still alive in the same draw. All of them are in the head-to-head index.